AUS MEINEM ARCHIV:

Da immer wieder auf die Menschenrechte gepocht wird, als seien die das höchste der Gefühle, dabei sind sie wie so Vieles das buchstäbliche Linsengericht. Es sind immer die gleichen Prinzipien, die dazu dienen den Menschen von seiner ihm innewohnenden Souveränität abzulenken, fernzuhalten.
ANNA VON REITZ einkluges und unbequemes Weib zu den Menschenrechten:

Man versus Human
„People are not Persons. Men are not „hue-mans“ — aka, „humans“. Hue-man means „color of man“ in the same sense as „color of law“. It has nothing to do with physical color or race. It’s a legal trap. It’s more bullshit. This whole mantra of „human rights“ is more entrapment, more getting the victims to dig their own graves, unwittingly admit to slave status—-instead of claiming their true status as free men and women. This is something Mr. Trump and a whole lot of people need to know. You’re nota human. You’re a man. “ —quote me, Grandma.
….
They call you „humans“ and offer you „human rights“ in order to deprive you of your far greater standing as who and what you already are: free-born men and women, the natural and qualified heirs of all your countries and nations.
….
By touting „human rights“ they are offering to give what you are already owed as free men and women only with strings attached, and noisome labels and „legal admissions“ and undisclosed claims to own you and your assets as chattel backing their commercial enterprises. We are owed the Rights of Mankind, which come from Nature and Nature’s God, not „Human Rights“ granted as privileges to slaves and corporations.

mehr dazu:
ANNA VON REITZ, Man v. Human